Method and systems for receiving plural informations flows in a mimo system

ABSTRACT

In a communication system, such as a Multiple Input Multiple Output system operating in a spatial multiplexing mode, for use, e.g., in a WLAN or HSPDA device, a plurality of information flows are received via a set of receive antennas by deriving from at least some, and possibly all, of the receive antennas, respective RF signals, and producing from the RF signals thus derived, a plurality of receive signals, each receive signal to be demodulated to recover one of the information flows transmitted. The receive signals are produced as combinations of the RF signals having applied thereto relative RF phase shift weights.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to arrangements for receiving plural information flows. A possible field of use of such arrangements are so-called Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antenna systems.

DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

MIMO systems represent a promising solution for improving the capacity (throughput) and reliability (coverage range) of wireless communication systems.

In a MIMO system the transmitter is equipped with n_(T) antennas and the receiver with n_(R) antennas operating at the same time on the same frequency. A possible transmission mode of MIMO systems is the so-called spatial multiplexing (SM) technique based on the transmission of different data streams across the n_(T) antennas with the goal of increasing the overall throughput. Recent information theory results have revealed that a richly scattered multi-path wireless channel is capable of providing a huge capacity. In the presence of MIMO-SM transmission mode, the multi-path environment can be exploited by transmitting simultaneously on the same frequency different data streams on different transmitting antennas providing a K-fold capacity increase, where K is the minimum between the number of transmitting antennas and the number of receiving antennas, i.e. K=min(n_(T), n_(R)) with the constraint that n_(R)≧n_(T).

A block diagram of an exemplary MIMO system operating in a spatial multiplexing (SM) mode is shown in FIG. 1. There, a transmitter TX is shown which transmits a plurality of information flows towards a receiver RX over a channel C.

The transmitter TX can be thought of as a serial-to-parallel converter (S/P) or, equivalently, a time de-multiplexer. Supposing that every antenna is able to carry a data signal with a throughput equal to S, the overall throughput of the data signal x at the input of the MIMO transmitter TX is equal to n_(T)·S, that is n_(T) times larger than the throughput S carried by every single antenna. The spatial multiplexing effect across the multiple transmitting antennas introduced by the MIMO-SM transmitter leads to these data streams being mixed up in the air (i.e. in the “channel” C). If n_(R)≧n_(T) the output signal y can be recovered at the receiver RX by means of suitable signal processing algorithms. MIMO systems also offer a significant diversity advantage and thus they can improve the coverage range with respect to single antenna systems (SISO) by exploiting both transmit and receive antenna diversity.

The propagation channel C from the transmitter TX to the receiver RX can be modeled, for each multi-path component, by means of a channel matrix H of complex channel coefficients with size n_(R)×n_(T). The larger spectral efficiencies (high throughputs) that can be achieved with MIMO channels are based on the assumption that a rich scattering environment provides independent transmission paths from each transmit antenna to each receive antenna. Therefore, for single-user systems, a transmission and reception strategy that exploits this structure will achieve, with the minimum number of transmitting and receiving antennas K=min(n_(T), n_(R)), a linear increase of the transmission rate for the same bandwidth with no additional power expenditure over a single antenna system. This capacity increase requires a scattering environment such that the channel matrix between transmit and receive antenna pairs has full rank and independent entries and that perfect estimates of its coefficients are available at the receiver. Performance of a MIMO system operating in a SM mode, in terms of throughput versus signal to noise plus interference (SINR) ratio, will thus depend on the properties of the channel matrix.

The exemplary SM technique considered here is based on digital signal processing operations that are performed by the receiver, at base-band level, and, in principle, is essentially independent of the electromagnetic characteristics of the receiving antennas (provided they have omni-directional radiation patterns). In the case in question, the number n_(R) of receiving antennas is assumed to be larger or at most equal to the number n_(T) of the transmitting antennas or equivalently the number of the transmitted spatial streams. In comparison to conventional MIMO receivers with n_(R)=n_(T), those MIMO receivers having a number n_(R) of receiving antennas higher than the number n_(T) of multiple spatial streams provide a higher performance level, in terms of throughput versus signal to noise plus interference (SINR) ratio. This entails however a cost in terms of additional complexity due to the n_(R)−n_(T) additional receivers and more complex base band (BB) algorithms.

WO-A-03/073645 describes a radio communications device comprising three or more diverse antennas and either a plurality of transmit chains or a plurality of receive chains, and wherein there are fewer transmit or receive chains than antennas. The radio communications device is arranged to provide multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communications with the advantage that increased data rates can be achieved in addition to cost and space reduction. The antennas employed can have directional radiation patterns with the further advantage of providing higher levels of signal-to-interference plus noise ratios (SINR) when employed in a cellular network. The radio communications device comprises a selector arranged to select for each receive chain or for each transmit chain any one of the antennas for use in conjunction with that receive or transmit chain as, for example, in a switched antenna selection scheme.

WO-A-06/052058 describes a method for enhancing performance of a MIMO system employing a space-time coding (STC) scheme, MIMO-STC, in conjunction with transmit antenna selection scheme. The transmitter includes N transmit antennas that are in excess of the M transmit antennas required for transmitting a signal to a space channel. The transmitter selects the M transmit antennas among the N transmit antennas and transmits a symbol by space-time encoding the symbol. The receiver includes M receive antennas for receiving a signal from the space channel so that it detects the transmitted information symbol by using the signal received through the receive antenna and subsequently generates a transmit antenna selection information for selecting M transmit antennas among N transmit antennas and returns the information to the transmitter.

PCT Application PCT/EP2006/011430, not yet published at the time of filing of this application, discloses a wireless communication system wherein a sub-set of RF signals received from corresponding antenna elements is selected and combined into a single RF signal. The single RF signal is processed and demodulated in a single processing chain, which comprises a RF phasing network for co-phasing the selected RF signals before combining and a processor for controlling combining and phasing in order to obtain a single RF signal having a radio performance indicator which satisfies predetermined conditions.

OBJECT AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The Applicant has observed that the need exists for arrangements for use at the receiving side of e.g. a MIMO system with a number n_(R) of receiving antennas larger than the number n_(T) of transmitted spatial streams wherein only n_(T) RF receivers are required, with a consequent reduction in terms of hardware complexity.

A specific object of the invention is to provide such arrangements which can be used advantageously e.g. in a Wireless LAN (WLAN) or HSDPA (High Speed Downlink Packet Access) context while being simple and thus easy and inexpensive to produce.

The object of the invention is to provide a response to that need.

According to the present invention, that object is achieved by means of a method having the features set forth in the claims that follow. The invention also relates to a corresponding system as well a Wireless Local Area Network (W-LAN) device comprising such a system.

The claims are an integral part of the disclosure of the invention provided herein.

An embodiment of the invention is thus a method of receiving via a set of receive antennas a plurality of information flows, the method including the steps of:

-   -   deriving from at least a subset of said set of receive antennas         respective RF signals, and     -   producing from said RF signals a plurality of receive signals,         each said receive signal to be demodulated to recover one of         said information flows,

wherein said receive signals are produced as combinations of said RF signals having applied thereto relative phase shift weights.

In an embodiment, said respective RF signals re derived from all the receive antennas in the set.

In an embodiment, a MIMO receiver is provided which operates on the basis of the combination, at the RF level, of the signals received at the output of the n_(R) antennas in order to generate n_(T) RF signals at the input of the n_(T) RF receivers.

Embodiments of the invention provide a performance level which is higher than that of a conventional MIMO receiver with n_(T) omni-directional receive antennas while the extra complexity is limited to the additional number n_(R)−n_(T) of antennas and to the RF combining unit.

An embodiment of the invention is suitable to be employed in the presence of a switched beam antenna architecture where the combination of the signals received at the output of particular directional antennas can provide benefits in terms of array gain, diversity and interference rejection.

An embodiment of the invention can be employed in wireless systems transmitting multiple spatial streams as for example Wireless LAN (WLAN) compliant with the standard IEEE 802.11n, Wireless MAN (WMAN) compliant with the standard IEEE 802.16e and the HSDPA-MIMO system proposed in 3GPP Release 7.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ANNEXED DRAWINGS

The invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the enclosed figures of drawing, wherein:

FIG. 1 has been already described in the foregoing,

FIGS. 2 a to 2 c show exemplary antenna configurations,

FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of a switched beam antenna system,

FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a RF phasing circuit,

FIGS. 5 and 6 are further schematic representations of RF phasing circuits,

FIGS. 7 and 8 are schematic representations of switched beam antenna systems, and

FIG. 9 shows an exemplary antenna arrangement with directional antennas.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

This detailed description presents an exemplary method and a related device for the implementation of a MIMO-SM receiver that, while including a number n_(R) of receiving antennas larger than the number n_(T) of transmitted spatial streams, may require only n_(T) RF receivers with a consequent reduction in terms of hardware complexity. The exemplary architecture described herein may be based on the combination, at the RF level, of the signals received at the output of the n_(R) antennas in order to generate n_(T) RF signals at the input of the n_(T) RF receivers.

The n_(R)−n_(T) redundant antennas at the receiver may be used to collect different versions of the n_(T) transmitted spatial streams that can be combined, at the RF level, with suitable weighting factors, in order to generate an equivalent channel matrix H with good properties for the transmission of multiple spatial streams.

The minimum Euclidean distance of the received constellation may be a good parameter for determining the performance of a MIMO system operating in SM mode. A description of the related theory is provided by R. W. Heath and A. J. Paulraj in: “Switching Between Diversity and Multiplexing in MIMO Systems” published on IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 53, No. 6, June 2005.

In the following, an exemplary MIMO-SM system with two transmitting antennas and two receiving antennas will be considered, so that n_(R)=n_(T)=2.

In this particular example the channel matrix H has the following expression

$\begin{matrix} {H = \begin{pmatrix} h_{11} & h_{12} \\ h_{21} & h_{22} \end{pmatrix}} & (1) \end{matrix}$

where the coefficients h_(ij) with i=1,2 and j=1,2, in the case of omni-directional receiving antennas and a propagation scenario rich of scattering objects, are statistically independent complex zero mean Gaussian processes with an envelope having a Rayleigh probability density function and unitary variance. The minimum Euclidean distance of the codebook (or constellation) at the receiver (i.e. the codebook constructed when the channel operates on each codeword) may be a good performance indicator of a MIMO-SM system because, assuming maximum likelihood detection, the conditional error probability, given a channel realization, can be determined by the distance properties of the codebook at the receiver.

If s=[s₁, s₂]^(T) denotes a codeword comprised of two QPSK symbols s₁ and s₂ respectively transmitted by the first and the second antenna of a 2×2 MIMO-SM system and r=[r₁, r₂]^(T) denotes the corresponding codeword of symbols received respectively by the first and the second antenna, the following relationship applies:

r=H·s+n   (2)

where n=[n₁, n₂]^(T) is the contribution of the thermal noise samples n₁ and n₂ at the input of the first and the second antenna, respectively. These noise samples can be assumed to be gaussian with zero mean and variance equal to N₀. For convenience every transmitted signal codeword is assumed here to be normalized in order to have unit energy E_(s) so that E_(s)=∥s₁∥²+∥s₂∥²=1 and the channel H is assumed to be perfectly known at the receiver (via training symbols).

The following description will refer to a MIMO decoder based on a maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm and performance of the MIMO-SM system will be assumed to be indicated by the raw Bit Error Rate (BER) as a function of the signal-to-noise plus interference ratio (SINR) at each receiving antenna. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that any other MIMO decoder, such as e.g. a MIMO decoder based on maximum-a-posteriori algorithm, or any other performance indicator may be used.

The paper by R. W. Heath and A. J. Paulraj already cited in the foregoing shows that the error probability on the received codeword r conditioned to a particular channel realization H, denoted as P(error/H), is upper bounded by the following expression

$\begin{matrix} {{P\left( {{error}/H} \right)} \leq {\left( {2^{M} - 1} \right){{erfc}\left( {\frac{E_{S}}{2N_{0}}{d_{\min,r}^{2}(H)}} \right)}}} & (3) \end{matrix}$

where M is the overall number of bits carried by the MIMO-SM system for each possible transmitted codeword (e.g. with M equal to 4 for a system with n_(T)=2 and a QPSK modulation) and d_(min,r) ²(H) is the squared minimum Euclidean distance of the received codebook. In the particular case of QPSK modulation and n_(R)=n_(T)=2 transmitting and receiving antennas the squared minimum Euclidean distance of the received codebook d_(min,r) ²(H) conditioned to the channel matrix H can be computed as detailed in the following.

If one considers two transmitted codewords s _(i) and s _(j) such that s _(i)≠s _(j). The squared Euclidean distance between two possible transmitted codewords s _(i) and s _(j) at the receiver is given by

∥H·(s _(i)−s _(j))∥²

The minimum squared Euclidean distance at the receiver can be found by minimizing this difference over all possible codewords and can be expressed as

$\begin{matrix} {{d_{\min,r}^{2}(H)} = {{\underset{i \neq j}{\min\limits_{i,j}}{{{\underset{\_}{r}}_{i} - {\underset{\_}{r}}_{j}}}^{2}} = {\underset{i \neq j}{\min\limits_{i,j}}{{H \cdot \left( {{\underset{\_}{s}}_{i} - {\underset{\_}{s}}_{j}} \right)}}^{2}}}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

The impact of the minimum Euclidean distance d_(min,r) ²(H) of the codebook (or constellation) at the receiver on the performance of a MIMO-SM system in terms of raw BER as a function of the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) measured at each receiving antenna can be evaluated on the basis of the following conditional probabilities:

Raw BER ₁ =P{error|0.0<d _(min,r) ²(H)≦0.5}

Raw BER ₂ =P{error|0.5<d _(min,r) ²(H)≦1.0}

Raw BER ₃ =P{error|1.0<d _(min,r) ²(H)≦1.5}

Raw BER ₄ =P{error|1.5<d _(min,r) ²(H)≦2.0}

Raw BER ₅ =P{error|2.0<d _(min,r) ²(H)≦2.5}

These can be obtained by conditioning the Raw BER to different values of the minimum squared Euclidean distance d_(min,r) ²(H) quantized over five different intervals derived from the corresponding probability density function. For higher values of the parameter d_(min,r) ²(H), performance in terms of raw BER exhibits a significant gain in terms of SINR with respect to the corresponding curves obtained for smaller values of d_(min,r) ²(H).

The minimum Euclidean distance d_(min,r) ²(H) can be calculated at the receiver by exploiting the knowledge of channel matrix H, which is estimated by means of reference sequences. The computation of equation (4) may however require a search over a large number of transmitted codewords, which may be prohibitive for large constellations such as 16 QAM or 64 QAM. Measuring the parameter d_(min,r) ²(H) at the receiver may thus turn out to be overly complex.

It is thus possible to derive an indication about the minimum squared Euclidean distance of the constellation received from the corresponding value of Raw BER measured by the baseband (BB) modules of a MIMO receiver. Moreover, by exploiting the one-to-one relationship between one particular value of the raw BER and the corresponding value of the BER decoded at the output of the channel decoder or, alternatively, the corresponding value of packet error rate (PER), it is possible to derive an indirect measure of the minimum squared Euclidean distance through the corresponding value of PER averaged over a certain number of received packets. The lower the value of PER, the higher the corresponding value of minimum squared Euclidean distance.

Measuring MIMO receiver performance in terms of PER involves the reception of several packets and may be slower than a corresponding measurement of the minimum squared Euclidean distance (which in principle can be performed instantaneously on every packet received). Moreover, the measure of PER can be performed with a negligible complexity with respect to the measure of minimum squared Euclidean distance that, on the contrary, may impact on system complexity. The throughput (T) that a MIMO receiver can achieve is directly related to the PER according to the following relationship

T=T _(peak)·(1−PER)

where T_(peak) is the peak throughput achievable in the absence of errors in the received data stream. Consequently, it may also be possible to measure MIMO receiver performance in terms of the throughput (T) achievable in a particular propagation scenario. Moreover, MIMO wireless systems usually support adaptive modulation and coding techniques that adaptively change the employed modulation and coding scheme. A higher signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the receiver will translate into a higher product of the modulation order and the channel encoding rate employed and, consequently, the maximum achievable throughput T_(peak) will be higher.

If one defines the transmission mode (TM) employed as the set of parameters, including modulation order and channel encoding rate, which determines the maximum achievable throughput T_(peak), an alternative way for measuring the performance of a MIMO receiver may be via the transmission mode (TM) employed in a particular propagation scenario.

For a IEEE 802.11 WLAN system, the transmission mode may correspond to a particular transmission scheme, characterized by a particular modulation scheme (QPSK, 16 QAM, 64 QAM for example) and channel encoding rate (1/2, 3/4, 5/6 for example) that determine the maximum data rate at the output of PHY layer (6, 12, 18, 24, 54 Mbps for example). New transmission modes have been introduced for a MIMO-WLAN system compliant with the standard IEEE 802.11n. Similarly, for a UMTS system the transmission mode may correspond to a particular value for the transport format (TF) that determines the maximum data rate at the output of PHY layer (e.g. 12.2, 64, 128, 384 kbps) while for a HSPDA system the transmission mode may correspond to a particular value of the channel quality indicator (CQI) that determines the maximum data rate at the output of PHY layer (e.g. 325, 631, 871, 1291, 1800 kbps).

The quality of a MIMO-SM radio link perceived by a MIMO receiver can be reasonably measured by means of a quality function Q, that depends on some physical (PHY) and MAC layer parameters such as received signal strength indicator (RSSI), Packet Error Rate (PER), MAC throughput (T) and employed transmission mode (TM), i.e.:

Q _(s) =f(RSSI,PER,T,TM)

Usually, the higher the value of Q_(s), the higher the quality of the received signal at application level. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other quality indicators as indicated in the foregoing may be used to calculate an alternative quality function.

The function Q_(s) may thus be used as a Radio Performance Indicator (RPI) to select the beams (i.e. the RF channels) and the RF phase shift weights to be applied. Other types of Radio Performance Indicators (RPI) may be used within the framework of the arrangement described herein. It will however be appreciated that, while being representative of the quality of the respective RF signal, such radio performance indicators as e.g. the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), Packet Error Rate (PER), Signal to Interference-plus-Noise ratio (SINR), MAC throughput (T) and employed transmission mode (TM), or any combination of the aforementioned performance indicators will be non-RF, i.e. Intermediate Frequency (IF) or BaseBand (BB) indicators.

FIGS. 2 a to 2 c show some exemplary antenna configurations including a number of receive antennas n_(R) which will be assumed to be larger than the number n_(T) of transmitted spatial streams (i.e. information flows). In the following, the RF signals received at the output of the n_(R) antennas will be denoted as r_(i) where i=1,2, . . . , n_(R).

Specifically, in FIG. 2 a six antennas A₁,A₂, . . . , A₆ are arranged on a line. In FIGS. 2 b and 2 c, eight antennas A₁,A₂, . . . , A₈ are placed equidistantly on the perimeter of a square (FIG. 2 b) and the perimeter of a circle (FIG. 2 c).

For instance, an exemplary case can be considered where the number of transmitted spatial streams n_(T) is equal to 2 (two) and the number of receiving antennas n_(R) is equal to 8 (eight).

In a receiving apparatus the number of RF receivers may be equal to the number of receiving antennas n_(R) so that the base band (BB) processing unit has, as input, n_(R) digital signals that can be exploited for improving the system performance in terms of coverage and throughput. In this case, an equivalent channel matrix H can be defined as

$H = \begin{pmatrix} {h_{11}h_{12}} \\ {h_{21}h_{22}} \\ {h_{31}h_{32}} \\ {h_{41}h_{42}} \\ {h_{51}h_{52}} \\ \ldots \\ {h_{n_{R}1}h_{n_{R}2}} \end{pmatrix}$

so that the BB receiver may be a Maximum Likelihood (ML) receiver computing, with the knowledge of the signals r=[r₁, r₂, . . . r_(n) _(R) ]^(T) received in correspondence of the transmitted unknown symbols s=[s₁, s₂]^(T), the following metrics.

d ²( r,s _(i,j))=∥( r−H·s _(i,j))∥²  (5)

where s _(i,j)=[s_(i), s_(j)]^(T) is a particular codeword of the transmitted Codebook.

This first technique for exploiting the n_(R)−n_(T) redundant antennas may require a number of RF receivers or transceivers equal to the number n_(R) of receiving antennas with a consequent impact on the hardware complexity of the receiver at both BB and RF level.

In order to exploit the n_(R)−n_(T) redundant antennas, the receiver may select a set of n_(T) signals {A_(i),A_(j), . . . A_(k)} obtained at the output of n_(T) receiving antennas and feeding the input of the n_(T) RF receivers with the corresponding RF signals.

For exemplary purposes, one may consider the case of n_(R)=8 and n_(T)=2. In that case, an exemplary criterion for the selection of the pair (A_(i),A_(j)) of receiving antennas may involve selecting the two antennas (A_(i),A_(j)) with the highest values of received signal strength indicator (RSSI) measured by the BB processing unit. In particular, feedback signals generated by the BB processing unit may be used to control the antenna selection unit during the measurement of the RSSI from every particular beam.

A second possible criterion may involve selecting the two antennas (A_(i), A_(j)) that provide an equivalent channel matrix H

$H = \begin{pmatrix} h_{i\; 1} & h_{i2} \\ h_{j\; 1} & h_{j2} \end{pmatrix}$

with the largest squared Euclidean distance or, alternatively, with the highest value of quality function Q_(s) in terms of throughput (T) or transmission mode (TM).

In the following, this technique will be referred to generally as MIMO-SM with antenna selection, independently from the particular criterion employed for the selection of the antenna pair (A_(i), A_(j)).

An approach for exploiting the n_(R)−n_(T) redundant antennas at the receiver may be based on the generation of n_(T) signals z=[z₁, z₂, . . . z_(n) _(T) ]^(T) by linear multiplying the vector r=[r₁, r₂, . . . r_(n) _(R) ]^(T) of n_(R) received signals for a combining matrix W with n_(T) lines and n_(R) columns

$\begin{matrix} {{W = \begin{bmatrix} w_{1,1} & w_{1,2} & w_{1,3} & \ldots & w_{1,n_{R}} \\ w_{2,1} & w_{2,2} & w_{2,3} & \ldots & w_{2,n_{R}} \\ \; & \; & \; & \; & \; \\ w_{n_{T},1} & w_{n_{T},2} & w_{n_{T},3} & \ldots & w_{n_{T},n_{R}} \end{bmatrix}}{{so}\mspace{14mu} {that}}{\underset{\_}{z} = {W \cdot \underset{\_}{r}}}} & (6) \end{matrix}$

In the exemplary case, where the number of transmitted spatial streams n_(T) is equal to 2 and the number of receiving antennas n_(R) is equal to 8, the matrix W has 2 lines and 8 columns.

An embodiment of a possible switched beam antenna system is shown in FIG. 3. Specifically, a number of n_(R) antennas A₁,A₂, . . . A_(n) _(R) are connected to a phasing and combining network 10, which is in turn connected to two RF receivers 20 a and 20 b. A BB processing unit 30 is then able to generate feedback signals 40 for controlling the network 10, to perform an analysis of the signals currently received from the RF receivers 20 a and 20 b, and to select the most suitable antennas. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that also a dedicated control unit may be used in order to avoid modifications of the BB processing unit 30. Such a control unit may e.g. read the measurements provided by the BB processing unit 30 and control the feedback signals 40.

Generally, the received signals r=[r₁, r₂, . . . r_(n) _(R) ]^(T) can be written as:

r=H·s+n   (7)

where n=[n₁, n₂, . . . n_(n) _(R) ]^(T) is the vector of noise and interference samples at the input of every receiving antenna with components n_(i) with i=1,2, . . . n_(R) that are supposed to be spatially white complex gaussian random variables with zero mean and variance equal to N₀. By combining equation (7) and (6) follows that

z=W·H·s+W·n=G·s+m   (8)

where G is a matrix with n_(T) lines and n_(T) columns given by the product of the combining matrix W and the channel matrix H and m=[m₁, m₂, . . . m_(n) _(R) ]^(T) is the vector obtained by multiplying the vector of noise and interference samples n for the combining matrix W. Given a certain channel matrix H the basic idea consists in selecting the combining matrix W in order to obtain an equivalent channel matrix G with good properties in terms of minimum Euclidean distance of the received codebook d_(min,r) ²(G) or alternatively with higher value of quality function Q, in terms of throughput (T) or transmission mode (TM).

Moreover, when adopting this approach, by introducing some constraints on the values of the coefficients of the combining matrix W, the computation of the n_(T) signals z=[z₁, z₂, . . . z_(n) _(T) ]^(T) can be directly performed at the RF level with consequent savings in terms of hardware complexity; in this particular case, the number of required RF receivers is only equal to n_(T).

Assuming that every coefficient w_(i,j) with j=1,2, . . . n_(R) and i=1,2, . . . n_(T) of W has unitary module and phase equal to φ_(i,j) the product of the vector r=[r₁, r₂, . . . r_(n) _(R) ]^(T) by a particular line w _(i)=[w_(i,1), w_(i,2) w_(i,3) . . . w_(i,n) _(R) ]^(T) of the matrix W may be implemented by means the circuit shown in FIG. 4.

Specifically, such a circuit may include a set of RF phasing networks 12, which are connected to the respective antennas A_(i),A₂, . . . A_(nR) and to a common combiner 14.

In the exemplary case, the phasing and combining network 10 of FIG. 3 could be implemented by two of these circuits, which would then provide the signals to the RF receivers 20 a and 20 b.

A further simplification of the RF phasing network of FIG. 4 can be obtained by assuming that the phase φ_(i,j) of the weighting coefficient w_(i,j) can assume only particular quantized values.

Assuming that the phase φ_(i,j) of the coefficient w_(i,j) can take values in the set {0, π/2, π, 3/2 π}, the corresponding multiplication of the received signal r_(i) for the coefficient w_(ii) can be obtained by means of the circuit shown in FIG. 5, including a number of RF delay lines 52, 54, 56, 58 with different lengths.

It will be appreciated that, for the purposes of this description, a unitary real coefficient w_(i,j) with φ_(i,j) equal to zero will in any case be considered as a particular case for a phase shift weight.

In a corresponding embodiment as shown in FIG. 5, the “delay” line 52 will thus be a line avoiding (i.e. exempt of) any phase shift, while the delay lines 54, 56 and 58 generate phase shifts of 90°, 180° and 270°, respectively.

An arrangement including six RF switches SW₁, SW₂, . . . SW₆ will permit, by adequately setting the switches, to selectively obtain any one of the four values of phase shift in the set {0, π/2, π, 3/2π}.

The exemplary processing arrangement just described thus includes at least one RF delay line 54 to 58 to apply a phase shift weight (W) to a respective RF signal r₁, . . . , r_(nR) derived from the receive antennas. In the embodiment shown, the processing arrangement thus includes at least two propagation paths 52 to 58 for the RF signal r₁, . . . , r_(nR). At least one of these propagation paths 52 to 58 includes a said delay line (this is the case for the paths 54 to 58) with a different delay value. The switching elements SW1 to SW6 are operable to selectively direct the respective RF signal r₁, . . . , r_(nR) to the propagation paths 52 to 58 in order implement a different phase shift weight. One of the propagation paths, namely the path indicated by reference numeral 52 is exempt of any delay line (i.e. implements a phase shift weight equal tozero).

Implementing RF delay lines providing a specified phase shift and RF switches for selective connection thereof is well known in the art, which makes it unnecessary to provide a more detailed description herein.

The RF multiplier circuits of FIG. 4 can be simplified by assuming that the phase φ_(i,j) of the weighting coefficient w_(i,j) can assume only two particular quantized values in the set {0, π}. The corresponding multiplication of the received signal r_(i) for the coefficient w_(i,j) can thus be obtained by means of the circuit shown in FIG. 6.

Specifically, in this arrangement only the delay lines 52 (with no phase shift proper) and 56 and two switches SW₁ and SW₂ are required to obtain the RF multiplication.

A simplification of the overall receiver architecture can be obtained by supposing that, in every line of the combining matrix W, only n_(T)−1 coefficients w_(i,j) have unitary module and phase φ_(i,j) quantized e.g. over 4 or 2 different values, one coefficient is equal to 1, and the remaining n_(R)−n_(T) coefficients are equal to zero.

In this particular case an additional constraint may be introduced by requiring that, in every column of the combining matrix W only one coefficient w_(i,j) with j=1,2, . . . , n_(R) has a module equal to 1. This means that each one of the n_(R) signals received contributes only once to the combination.

For example, the combining matrix W may have the following structure

$W = \begin{bmatrix} {0,} & {0,} & {0,} & {w_{1,A},} & {0,} & {0,} & {w_{1,B},} & 0 \\ {0,} & {w_{2,C},} & {0,} & {0,} & {0,} & {w_{2,D},} & {0,} & 0 \end{bmatrix}$

with the following conditions for the four coefficients different from zero:

w_(1,A)=1

w_(2,C)=1

w _(1,B) =w ₁=exp(jφ ₁) with φ₁ε{0, π} or

-   -   φ₁ε{0,π/2, π, 3/2π}

w _(2,D) =w ₂=exp(jφ ₂) with φ₂ε{0, π} or

-   -   φ₂ε{0, π/2, π, 3/2π}

Specifically, the positions of the coefficients w_(1,A) and w_(1,B) in the first line of the combining matrix W determine, among the n_(R)=8 signals r=[r₁, r₂, . . . r_(n) _(R) ]^(T) received from the antennas A₁,A₂, . . . A₈, those signals r_(A) and r_(B) that are combined through the RF multiplication for the weighting coefficient w_(1,B) in the following denoted as w₁.

In a similar way the position of the coefficients w_(2,C) and w_(2,D) in the second line of the combining matrix W determines the signals r_(C) and r_(D) that are combined through the RF multiplication for the weighting coefficient W_(2,D) in the following denoted as w₂.

Finally, the constraint requiring that in every column of the combining matrix W is only one coefficient w_(i,j) with j=1,2, . . . , n_(R) that has a module equal to 1, corresponds to combining, at RF level, two RF signals r_(A) and r_(B), whose weighted sum feeds the first RF receiver, that are different from the corresponding two RF signals r_(C) and r_(D) that are combined at RF level and whose weighted sum feeds the second RF receiver.

FIG. 7 shows schematically a possible embodiment of a switched beam antenna system for the exemplary case of n_(R)=8 and n_(T)=2. Specifically, the signals r=[r₁, r₂, . . . r_(n) _(R) ]^(T) received from the antennas A₁,A₂, . . . A₈ are connected to a switching network 122, which provides the signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D). The switching network 122 may be set e.g. through the BB processing circuit 30, which analyses the quality function Q_(s) and provides the information about the signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) which are selected.

The signals r_(A) and r_(B) are then processed by multiplying them by the respective coefficients of the matrix W, to be then combined in a combiner 14 a and provided to the first RF processing chain 20 a. Specifically, no multiplication is necessary for the signal r_(A), because the coefficient w_(1,A) is equal to 1. Instead the signal r_(B) is multiplied with the coefficient w₁ (i.e. w_(1,B)) by a first RF phasing network 124 a.

Similarly, only the signal r_(D) may be multiplied with the coefficient w₂ (i.e. w_(2,D)) by a second RF phasing network 124 b, and the weighted signals are combined in a combiner 14 b and provided to the second RF processing chain 20 b.

Applicants verified that this condition ensures that the equivalent channel matrix G has good properties in terms of minimum Euclidean distance of the received codebook and consequently also in terms of in terms of throughput (T).

The operations performed by the MIMO wireless receiver or transceiver with redundant antennas shown in FIG. 7 are therefore the following:

-   -   determine, among the n_(R)=8 received signals, the 4 signals         r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) according to a first criteria, and     -   determine the values of the phases of the 2 weighting         coefficients w₁ and w₂ according to a second criteria.

The final goal is to maximize a certain quality function Q_(s) that can be measured by the receiver in terms, for example, of received signal strength indicator (RSSI), Packet Error Rate (PER), MAC throughput (T) and employed transmission mode (TM) or in terms of a suitable combination of the aforementioned performance indicators so that the first criteria for the selection of the signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C), and r_(D) together with the second criteria for the selection of the weighting coefficients w₁ and w₂ should be chosen with the goal of maximizing a quality function Q_(s).

Exemplary embodiments of criteria for the selection of the signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C), and r_(D) are provided in the following. In the particular case of propagation scenarios without interference from the neighboring cells, where thermal noise is the main limiting factor, it is possible to select the four signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) with the higher values of received signal strength indicator (RSSI) measured by the BB processing unit 30.

On the contrary, for propagation scenarios with a high level of interference it is possible to select the 4 signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) with the highest value of signal-to-noise plus interference ratio (SINR) measured by the BB processing unit 30. The signal-to-noise plus interference ratio (SINR) can be measured, for example, as difference of subsequent measures of RSSI obtained first on the useful transmitter and then on the interfering transmitter. This approach is not very precise when the transmissions of the reference beacon channels of the useful and of the interfering transmitters present a certain overlap in time.

Alternatively, it is possible to select the four signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) providing the higher values of throughput (T) measured by the BB processing unit 30.

After having selected the four signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) it is possible to optimize the values of the coefficients w₁ and w₂ through an exhaustive search driven by a certain performance indicator provided by the BB processing unit 30 such as the throughput (T) of the radio link.

In case of coefficients w₁ and w₂ quantized over two different values four different values of the aforementioned performance indicators are computed, while, in the case of coefficients quantized over four different values, sixteen different values of the performance indicator are computed and the coefficients w₁ and w₂ providing the highest value of the performance indicator are selected.

Another exemplary approach involves selecting the four signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) jointly with the four or sixteen 16 values of the coefficients w₁ and w₂ through an exhaustive search driven by a certain performance indicator provided by the BB processing unit 30, such as the throughput (T) of the radio link. This approach may require a longer computational time but provides the optimal combination of the signals received and the weights that maximize the performance indicator considered.

In the particular case where the number of transmitted spatial streams n_(T) is equal to two and the number of receiving antennas n_(R) is equal to eight, the overall number of combination of the signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) with the values of the coefficients w₁ and w₂ is equal to 6720 for coefficients w₁ and w₂ quantized over 2 values and to 26880 for coefficients w₁ and w₂ quantized over 4 values. Under these assumptions an exhaustive search may not be feasible for most applications.

Possible simplifications of the switching network 122 for selecting the signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) can be envisaged in order to reduce the time for performing the exhaustive search.

In FIG. 8 shows an exemplary simplified switching network where only some particular combinations of the signals received by the different beams can be provided to the two RF processing chains 20 a and 20 b.

Specifically, the switching network 122 of FIG. 7 may be implemented e.g. by means of four switches. A first switch 122 a may select the signal r_(A) among the signals provided from the antennas B₆ and B₈. Similarly the switches 122 b, 122 c, 122 d may select the signal r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) among the signals provided from the antennas B₂ and B₄, B₅ and B₇, and B₁ and B₃, respectively.

In the exemplary implementation of the switching network shown in FIG. 8, the overall number of combination of the signals r_(A), r_(B), r_(C) and r_(D) with the values of the coefficients w₁ and w₂ is equal to 64 for coefficients w₁ and w₂ quantized over 2 values and to 256 for coefficients w₁ and w₂ quantized over 4 values so that the search procedure is greatly simplified at the cost of a slight reduction of the system performance due to non exhaustive search procedure of the received signals.

The technique proposed for the reception of multiple spatial streams with redundant antennas can be employed in the presence of receiving antennas with omni-directional radiation patterns or alternatively in the presence of directional antennas with the further advantage of introducing a beneficial effect of spatial filtering (through the selection of four out of eight directional receiving antennas) that can increase system performance in the presence of a propagation scenario limited by interferers that are not spatially white.

The most common antenna types for WLANs have omni-directional radiation patterns. Omni-directional antennas propagate RF signals in all directions equally on a horizontal plane (azimuth plane). The gain achieved with an omni-directional antenna can somehow not be sufficient to reach certain coverage ranges. Higher gain values can be obtained when adopting a directional antenna, which is able to focus the transmitted and received RF energy in a particular direction thus achieving higher coverage ranges.

Moreover, in order to achieve an improvement both in terms of coverage and throughput, the spatial domain of the propagation environment can be exploited by adopting multiple antennas. Such systems increase the information available at the receiver end by means of appropriate signal processing techniques, thus reducing the impairments such as multi-path interference introduced during the transmission over the propagation channel. The exploitation of multiple directional antennas can lead to good performance in terms of throughput and coverage range.

In the particular case of directional antennas, the design of the antenna system has to take into account that the received signals arrive from all possible directions. In particular the Angle of Arrival (AoA) in the azimuth plane may take all the possible values between 0 and 360 degrees due to the presence of many scattering objects surrounding the receiver.

The AoA distribution in the elevation plane depends on the transmitter position. The transmitters are generally placed in the centre of the room or fixed to a wall or to the ceiling in order to provide maximum coverage. It is then reasonable to assume the AoA in the elevation plane is concentrated around the horizontal direction with an angular spread lower than 180 degrees.

The top view of a possible multiple directional antenna system is shown in FIG. 9 in the particular case of N=8 directional antennas B₁, B₂, . . . B₈ (placed on the vertexes of a regular octagon circumscribed by a circumference).

Experimental results have been obtained by the Applicant, i.a. with reference to three different receiver architectures, namely:

-   -   MIMO 2×2: the basic reference system, equipped with 2         omni-directional antennas that feed 2 RF receivers at the         receiver end,     -   MIMO 2×8 with selection of 2 directional antennas, where the         receiver selects (among the 8 available receiving antennas) a         suitable pair of antennas and feeds their signals to the input         of 2 RF receivers. The selection of the 2 antennas is carried         out by referring to the two highest Received Signal Strength         Indicator (RSSI) values, and     -   MIMO 2×8 with RF combination of 4 directional antennas, where         the receiver selects (among the 8 available receiving antennas)         two pairs of signals feeding the input of the 2 RF receivers.         The 4 signals are selected as follows. First the selection of 4         antennas is carried on by determining, among the 8 signals         received by the available antennas, the 4 signals that maximize         a certain performance indicator (e.g. RSSI in a noise-limited         scenario, SINR in an interference-limited scenario).         Subsequently the receiver determines the appropriate phase         values of the 2 weighting coefficients that maximize the same         performance indicator value for the combined signals. The         architecture is shown in FIG. 8.

Four different propagation scenarios were used to evaluate system performance. These four scenarios refer to different propagation environments that are all characterized by the presence of a transmitter (TX) position and a receiver (RX) position, by two separate clusters of scatterers. All the scenarios had the same Angle of Arrival (AoA) and Angle of Departure (AoD) values but have different Angle Spread (AS) values. The angle spread values were subsequently reduced from Case 1 to Case 4, this leading to less scattered environments thus achieving higher correlation conditions. In the two first scenarios a richly scattered propagation leads to low correlation, and in the last case poorly scattered propagation leads to high correlation.

Results were obtained, in the particular case of n_(R)=8 and n_(T)=2, by employing the directional antenna system as shown in FIG. 9 and the architecture of the MIMO wireless transceiver with redundant antennas shown in FIG. 8.

Performance of these two 2×8 MIMO antenna systems were compared with that of a conventional 2×2 MIMO antenna system, with specific reference to a propagation scenario where the limiting factor is the interference generated by the other users (access point or clients), which were assumed to be uniformly distributed in the spatial domain (spatially white).

The results demonstrate that the enhancement in performance, expressed in terms of raw BER, is approximately 6 dB in the range of interest. This value is slightly reduced (to 5 dB) when the propagation conditions are such that the reduced angle spread leads to higher correlation of the received signals.

The results show an even higher gain in performance in the case of spatially colored interferers.

Without prejudice to the underlying principles of the invention, the details and the embodiments may vary, even appreciably, with reference to what has been described by way of example only, without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the annexed claims. 

1-19. (canceled)
 20. A method of receiving via a set of receive antennas a plurality of information flows, comprising: deriving from at least a subset of said set of receive antennas respective RF signals; and producing from said RF signals a plurality of receive signals, each said receive signal to be demodulated to recover one of said information flows in said plurality, wherein said receive signals are produced as combinations of said RF signals having applied thereto relative RF phase shift weights.
 21. The method of claim 20, comprising deriving respective RF signals from all of the receive antennas in said set.
 22. The method of claim 20, comprising: selecting among said RF signals different sets of said RF signals, and producing said receive signals as combinations of the RF signals in said different sets of said RF signals, having applied thereto relative RF phase shift weights.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein said different sets of said RF signals each comprise a respective set of RF signals, whereby each RF signal is included in only one of said sets of RF signals.
 24. The method of claim 20, comprising: generating for said RF signals at least one non-RF radio performance indicator respective of the quality of said RF signals; and generating said RF phase shift weights as a function of said at least one non-RF radio performance indicator.
 25. The method of claim 24, wherein said at least one radio performance indicator is selected from: received signal strength indicator, packet error rate, signal to interference-plus-noise ratio, MAC throughput and employed transmission mode, and combinations thereof.
 26. The method of claim 20, wherein the number of said receive antennas is higher than the number of said information flows.
 27. A system for receiving via a set of receive antennas, a plurality of information flows, comprising: a connection arrangement capable of deriving from at least a subset of said set of receive antennas respective RF signals; and a processing arrangement capable of producing from said RF signals a plurality of receive signals, each receive signal capable of being demodulated to recover one of said information flows in said plurality, wherein said processing arrangement comprises a RF combining network capable of producing said receive signals as combinations of said RF signals having applied thereto relative RF phase shift weights.
 28. The system of claim 27, comprising said connection arrangement capable of being configured for deriving respective RF signals from all of the receive antennas in said set.
 29. The system of claim 27, wherein said connection arrangement is capable of being configured for selecting among said RF signals different sets of said RF signals, and said processing arrangement comprises an RF combining network capable of producing said receive signals as combinations of the RF signals in said different sets of said RF signals having applied thereto relative RF phase shift weights.
 30. The system of claim 29, wherein said connection arrangement is capable of being configured for selecting said different sets of said RF signals to each include a respective set of RF signals, whereby each said RF signal is in only one of said sets of RF signals.
 31. The system of claim 27, comprising a configuration capable of: generating for said RF signals at least one non-RF radio performance indicator representative of the quality of said RF signals; and generating said RF phase shift weights as a function of said at least one non-RF radio performance indicator.
 32. The system of claim 31, wherein said at least one radio performance indicator is selected from: received signal strength indicator, packet error rate, signal to interference-plus-noise ratio, MAC throughput and employed transmission mode, and combinations thereof.
 33. The system of claim 27, wherein said connection arrangement comprises inputs equal in number to the number of said receive antennas and said processing arrangement comprises outputs equal in number to said information flows.
 34. The system of claim 27, wherein said processing arrangement comprises at least one RF delay line capable of applying a respective RF phase shift weight to one of said RF signals.
 35. The system of claim 34, wherein said processing arrangement comprises: at least two propagation paths for said respective one of said RF signals, wherein at least one of said propagation paths comprises one said delay line; and associated switching elements capable of selectively directing said respective one of said RF signals to said at least two propagation paths.
 36. The system of claim 35, wherein one of said at least two propagation paths is exempt from delay lines.
 37. A wireless local area network device comprising a wireless communication system according to claim
 27. 38. A high speed downlink packet access device comprising a wireless communication system according to claim
 27. 